Who Belongs Where? The Politics of Internal Deportation, Nativism and Migration in Nigeria

07 June 2025, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed at the time of posting.

Abstract

In Nigeria’s federal system, certain states impose mobility restrictions that result in the internal deportation of citizens to their so-called ‘states of origin’. This paper investigates this practice through a case study of the Lagos State government’s deportation of Nigerians labelled as ‘non-indigenes’. While existing scholarship primarily frames such actions as violations of human and constitutional rights, less attention has been given to their role within the broader frameworks of migration governance. Drawing on nativism theory and employing qualitative content analysis of government press releases and media reports related to two high-profile cases from 2013 and 2024, the study argues that internal deportation functions as an exclusionary state policy aimed at regulating mobility along ethnic and regional lines. The analysis demonstrates how state officials legitimise these practices through exclusionary rhetoric, security narratives, and nativist labelling, discursive strategies commonly associated with international migration regimes, to reinforce negative perceptions of internal migrants.

Keywords

Indigeneity
Internal migration
Internal deportation
Nativism
Lagos State

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.